Democrats Challenge Trump’s Election Overhaul Executive Order in Court

The lawsuit argues that the U.S. Constitution gives authority over federal elections to states and Congress, not the president.

Washington, D.C.: The Democratic Party has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, seeking to block an executive order that overhauls the U.S. election system. The lawsuit argues that the order, issued by Republican President Donald Trump, could disenfranchise eligible voters and exceeds presidential authority.

In the lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) contends that Trump’s March 25 order imposes unlawful restrictions, including requiring voters to provide proof of U.S. citizenship, prohibiting states from counting mail-in ballots received after Election Day, and threatening to withhold federal funding from non-compliant states.

“The Executive Order seeks to impose radical changes on how Americans register to vote, cast a ballot, and participate in our democracy—all of which threaten to disenfranchise lawful voters and none of which is legal,” states the lawsuit, which was filed by veteran Democratic election attorney Marc Elias and his legal team.

Prominent Democratic leaders, including U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer and U.S. Representative Hakeem Jeffries, have joined as plaintiffs in the case, underscoring the party’s broad opposition to the order.

The White House has not immediately responded to requests for comment. The Trump administration has previously defended the order as a measure to safeguard U.S. elections from foreign interference.

Also Read | With Kid Rock at His Side, Trump Moves to Reform Ticketing Industry

Trump has frequently cast doubt on the integrity of the U.S. electoral system and continues to claim, without evidence, that his 2020 election loss to Democratic President Joe Biden was the result of widespread voter fraud. The president and his Republican allies have also made unsubstantiated claims regarding non-citizen voting, which is illegal and occurs rarely.

The lawsuit asserts that the U.S. Constitution grants authority over federal elections to individual states and Congress, not the president. The Democrats argue that this separation of powers is crucial in preventing any president from altering election rules for personal political gain.

Also Read | SpaceX Launches Fram2: First Private Astronaut Mission on Polar Orbit

“The Framers of our federal Constitution foresaw that self-interested and self-aggrandizing leaders might seek to corrupt our democratic system of government to expand and preserve their own power,” the lawsuit states.

In a parallel legal challenge, voting rights organizations, including the Campaign Legal Center and State Democracy Defenders Fund, have also sued to block the executive order, reinforcing the broad opposition to its implementation.

Also Read | U.S. Appeals Court Refuses to Delay Ruling Against Transgender Service Ban

Recent News

Boeing Lowers Long-Term Jet Demand Outlook Amid Growth Forecast Cuts

New York: Boeing has trimmed its 20-year forecast for global jet demand, even as it projects a more than 40% increase in global air...

Macron Visits Greenland to Push Back Against U.S. Annexation Threats

Paris: French President Emmanuel Macron is set to visit Greenland on Sunday in a high-stakes diplomatic move aimed at reinforcing European unity and supporting...

Middle East on Edge as Israel Hits Iran’s South Pars Gas Field

Tel Aviv/Tehran: Israel and Iran have launched a fresh wave of attacks on each other, heightening fears of a full-scale regional war, following an...

ECB President Lagarde Says 2% Inflation Target Is Within Reach

Brussels: European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde expressed confidence that the eurozone is nearing its long-term inflation target, citing recent economic data and revised...